Comments for It Takes 30

Comment on Three UCL Excellence Fellowships, London UK by Robert Insall

Robert Insall — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:56:09 +0000

I recommend caution in pinning your career to the Crick Institute! Until their career structure and financing are settled, nonlinear behaviour and chaotic oscillations are likely.

Comment on Another spot-on comic from XKCD by Tami

Tami — Thu, 15 Nov 2012 06:39:50 +0000

I liked the below reply post and the many of the discussions in the comments. As a bonus, the post includes the line “If the sun as gone nova, money is worthless. Hence anyone, Bayesian or not, should be willing to bet $50 that the sun has not exploded.”
http://andrewgelman.com/2012/11/16808/

Comment on hola by Becky

Becky — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:52:21 +0000

Glad to have you visit, Ed! Come back often.

Comment on hola by Ed

Ed — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:49:45 +0000

lol, hola from Costa Rica! I actually came to see the Cellular Morse code, but wanted to say hi as well haha

Comment on Fluorescent protein labeling: a cautionary tale by Nature methods special issue: focus on bioimage informatics (Part I ) | greenfluorescentblog

Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:12:24 +0000

[...] to this special issue, here’s an interesting post from the blog It takes 30: Fluorescent protein labeling – a cautionary tale. Share this:MoreLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Image analysis, [...]

Comment on For fans of A Game Of Thrones by Anonymous sci-fi nerd

Anonymous sci-fi nerd — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:09:53 +0000

I second the plea.

Comment on What were they THINKING? by Linus

Linus — Sat, 23 Jun 2012 08:37:56 +0000

Comment on What were they THINKING? by Steve.

Steve. — Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:33:48 +0000

I think that that’s quite good actually. Out of curiosity, apart from the tag line which was a bit cringey, how does it differ from an average episode of CSI?

Comment on What were they THINKING? by Quant

Quant — Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:32:20 +0000

Well I think it’s apparent from this video what our Commission thinks the female scientists do/should do/will do?

Comment on What were they THINKING? by abc

abc — Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:16:39 +0000

embarrassing, humiliating, and so, so sad. I don’t think that girls getting into science is the problem. The problem comes after that, when they find out it is a guy’s world.